Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Things To Do On Wedding Anniversary In Bangalore

Policy

Yesterday, a series of news has rocked my sensibilities as a Catholic who does not recognize itself in action "policy" of this Church.

The newspapers reported the interview one of the signatories of the famous appeal against the Pope to La Sapienza, his opinion was that no one had wanted to prevent the Pope's presence, denied the opportunity because of his lecture at the inauguration of the academic year.

I was among those who thought that these professors had done something wrong and paradoxical to defend the right to speak of science against the interference of the Church. In the sense that, even though it is true that these professors stated, I thought that their protest was not desirable. He had the opportunity to stage a noisy joke when it was represented to the allegation of a Pope who has television and radio, to a hierarchy that has legions of parliamentary overestimated compared to the current role of Catholics in the life of Italians.

But you really believe that the Pope could have stopped the opposition of 67 professors and 300 students of 4500 on 150,000?

Come ... raccontiamole stories to the children ...

The "hierarchy" wanted to create the case, I disagree with that Magdi Allam on this topic says, "Because if this ideological fanatic and violent minority is able to achieve its purpose, means that the majority was in fact surrendered arbitrariness and tyranny of the minority . None had surrendered

and most people were in favor of the intervention of the Pope, if he would have gone out and talked the boys were questioned. Is this democracy? Talk Pope, but even those who disagree.

But the paradox that we defend the right word to apply to the Pope (who else defends itself very well ..) and not for those who do not agree. Some come to ask stupid even the dismissal of professors ... this here is not democracy.

Another report concerns the politicization of the Angelus .. an entire political class that is afraid of the strength of the church occurred in a church service to show solidarity to the Pope .. but should not be separate moments of the soul and those of politics? From right to left, Borghenzio to Rutelli, from casino to the inevitable Fioroni Andreotti and Mastella.

Would not it be better to say that the various cardinals our politicians to show a different occasion. No, even if they are pleased.

part of their policy efforts.

Pathetic to see the procession of ex-communists, ex-radical, ex-married, and acquitted for prescription multifamiglie fall down and say "I was there." The political class is in shambles and you know, but also the Church, for that part of his "being a political entity," is part of it and suffer the consequences.

The churches are emptying, decrease the priests and the last news item yesterday I wanted to mention is the one that shows that even the Church as an institution, is now regarded as authoritative by less than 50% of Italians, a sharp drop from a year previous year. Only in parliament there is a disproportionate representation in the real presence of the Church in society, a sign that this representation is functional only to the maintenance of power, which could be jeopardized (for politicians as weak as ours) by a strong enforcement action by the very of the Church. As in other famous cases is the power of the Church media today its political force, but Pope complained ...

The Church or rather the policy of the Church, men grown old comparing only men and according to the logic of their politics, are far from civil society, it does not collect the bodies and just try to express their strength. They proved in the last referendum, they are aware of not having the strength to overcome their ideas do not have "said" an idea, have resorted to abstention to win. Just like that Craxi called to go to the beach.

to read all these stories I have "almost" regretted not having been agreed with the professors, but luckily it was on yesterday's newspaper also reported a speech by Cardinal Tettamanzi on the understanding of pain of separations and divorces .. but this is (thankfully) a whole other post.

0 comments:

Post a Comment